Event Archive

Media Ethics
IRD invited two distinguished American and Canadian scholars-Dr. Robert Jenson, Professor of Media and Global Studies at the University of Texas, Austin and Dr. Justin Podur, Professor of Environmental Sciences at York University, Toronto – to spend 3-4 weeks at the IRD, IIUI as Iqbal Fellows during June-July, 2008 to deliver public lectures and teach short intensive courses in their respective areas of specialization. Dr. Jenson and Dr. Podur made their services to the IRD, IIUI available entirely on pro bono basis. Their presence at the IRD, IIUI proved immensely useful for students and faculty of the IIUI and for the intellectual community of Islamabad. In addition to teaching courses, giving public lectures, and participating in a number of panel discussions, they generously made themselves available to the students and the faculty of the IIUI both on group and one-to-one basis for discussion and research guidance. Their public lectures and presentations in panel discussions were telecast by the PTV. Both Dr. Jenson and Dr. Podur appeared in the popular GEO TV programmes “Nadia Khan Show” on “Media Ethics” and “Global Environment Issues.”
 
Karen Armstrong on “Tolerance in Islam”

The IRD's inaugural event was a major public lecture on "Tolerance in Islam: A Historical Perspective" on February 1, 2008 by one of the world's leading intellectuals on the subject of world religions, Karen Armstrong-author of The Battle for God, A History of Fundamentalism, Muhammad: A Biography, and Islam: A Short History. The lecture was organized at the Islamabad Convention Centre and was attended by more than three thousand people. It received the widest coverage in the national and international media and was considered a major intellectual event in recent history of the city.
 
Education Sustainable Society
A lecture on “Education the Key to Sustainable Society” was delivered by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schluchter, Director of the Centre for Human Ecology at the University of Technology Cottbus, Germany on 14 February 2008. The lecture was attended by the IIUI community as well as by members of the general public.
 
Madrasas in Pakistan
The IRD organized a lecture of Dr. Jamal Malik, a prominent German scholar of Pakistani descent who has done seminal work on Madrasa education and Islam and politics in Pakistan. Dr. Malik is a Professor of Islamic Studies/Religious Studies at the University of Erfurt in Germany. The title of his lecture was “Madrasas in Pakistan: Are they teaching extremism?” A large number of people from the IIUI and other institutions attended his lecture in the new Auditorium Complex.
 
Revisiting Islam and Modernity Debate
A well-publicized and well-attended international conference on “Revisiting the Islam-Modernity Debate” was organized on June 4-5, 2008 in the new Auditorium Complex at the IIUI. The conference included participants from the UK, USA, India, as well as a number of scholars from Pakistan and was attended by IIUI faculty and students, invited guests from several think tanks, universities, learned bodies, and NGOs in Islamabad, members of the media, and general public. The conference was divided into four panels in order to focus on some specific aspects of the issue. Each panel was addressed by four panelists, followed by lively question-answer sessions.

Those who addressed the conference as panelists or discussants included:

Professor Tamara Sonn; Professor Shahid Alam; Professor Fauzia Afzal Khan; Professor Salman Seyed; Professor Iqbal Ansari; Senator Mushahid Hussain Sayed; Senator Professor Khurshid Ahmad; Professor Pervez Hoodbhoy; Professor Noaman-ul-Haq; Dr. Asim Sajjad; Dr. Farooq Khan; Mr. Khaled Ahmed; Professor Suroosh Arfani; Dr. Manzoor Ahmad; Dr. Anwar H. Siddiqui; Dr. Zafar Ishaq Ansari, and Mumtaz Ahmad.

The conference was highly successful in terms of achieving its objectives to (a) bring in fresh thinking on the issue of Islam and modernity; (b) examine the current trends in the debate on modernity; (c) explore the varieties of ways in which both Islam and modernity are understood and interpreted; and (d) interrogate some of the most important concomitants of modernity liberalism, secularism, nationalism, democracy, Westernization and capitalism as they are seen and engaged by Muslim intellectuals. The conference proceedings were widely reported in the media.

 
Globalization and Muslim Identity
Another major event organized by the IRD was a public lecture on Globalization and Muslim Identity by one of the most well-known Muslim intellectuals in the world, Dr. Tariq Ramadan author of Western Muslims and the Future of Islam and most recently, In the Footsteps of the Prophet. Dr. Tariq Ramadan is currently a Professor of Islamic Studies at Oxford. The lecture attracted a large number of Islamabad intellectuals and people from different sectors of society. The PTV broadcast the entire lecture of Dr. Ramadan in a special programme.
 
 
Public Lectures

In addition, IRD organized a number of lectures, panels, and short courses for the students and the faculty of the IIUI and other universities in the area as well as for the general public. These lectures and panels have included scholars such as:

Dr. Salman Sayyid (University of Leeds, UK),

Dr. Tamara Sonn (College of William & Mary, USA),

Dr. Robert Jensen (University of Texas at Austin, USA),

Dr. Justin Podur (York University, Canada);

Senator Mushahid Hussain Sayed;

Dr. Anis Ahmad (Vice-Chancellor, Ripha International University).

The topics of these panel discussions included: (1) Human Rights in the Muslim World: Challenges and Possibilities, (2) Religion, Culture, and the Political: Critical Reflections on the Contemporary World, and (3) Globalization and the State of Democracy. Students, faculty, policymakers, intellectuals, and NGO personnel have benefited enormously from these events and from their engaged discussions and lively exchanges.

The IRD collaborated with other think tanks and NGOs in Islamabad area to facilitate public lectures by the two distinguished Iqbal Fellows, Dr. Robert Jenson and Dr. Justine Podur. Both Dr. Jenson and Dr. Podur delivered lectures and/or participated in panel discussions at the Institute of Strategic Studies, Institute of Policy Studies, Committee on Peace & Justice, and the Sustainable Development Institute. We at IRD feel that this is one more effective way in which the Iqbal Institutes name and commitment to intellectual excellence and informed discourse is publicized and appreciated especially by those organizations and institutions that are well-established in Pakistani society

 
U.S. After The Elections American: Foreign Policy Under The New Administration

A panel discussion on U.S. After The Elections American: Foreign Policy Under The New Administration was held in the University auditorium. A large number of faculty members and students attended the panel discussion.
 
Jack Straw: Pakistan & the United Kingdom
A lecture of U.K Secretary of Justice Mr. Jack Straw on “Pakistan and the United Kingdom: A Living Bridge” was organized by IRD on 16 September, 2008. The lecture was attended by more than 400 students, faculty members and invited guests. Mr. Straw said that Islam is the second largest religion in Britannia and it is fast growing religion in Western Europe. He added that in his own constituency, 60 thousand Pakistanis are residing. British Secretary of Justice Mr. Jack Straw added that Pakistan and the United Kingdom enjoy deep rooted relations. About Great Britain, he said that his country respects Islam and Muslims and believes that Pakistanis in Britain can play an important role in strengthening Pakistan-UK relations. Mr. Straw, after his talk, joined his hosts in Iftar and exchanged views with the students and faculty members.

 
Samuel Huntington: His life and works
A reference was organized in memory of Harvard political scientist, Prof. Samuel P. Huntington, whose scholarly work, in particular Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order has been the most discussed and debated publication during the last quarter of a century. Prof. Huntington died on 24 December 2008 after teaching at Harvard University for 58 years at the age of 81. The reference session was attended by scholars, teachers and students of Social sciences and International Relations disciplines. Speaking on the occasion, Rector of the International Islamic University remembered his academic association with the great social scientist and described him as an unusual scholar who introduced controversies and thrived on them during his long scholarly career. There is little doubt that Huntington was keen to retain the White Protestant image of United States and contributed his thought towards that end. President of International Islamic University, Dr. Anwar Hussain Siddiqui urged the audience to carry forward the legacy of the great scholar by challenging his ideas on academic level and providing a more plausible philosophy for the future of the world. Dr. Charles Haines, professor of Anthropology of American University at Cairo stated that the approach of the great scholar was purely subjective. Huntington would welcome military dictatorship in Algeria and elsewhere in the world if democracy did not support American interest. Similarly in his earlier work, he seems to support military dictatorships in the third world countries. Dr. Haines compared the casualties in Congo with Iraq and rejected the clash of civilizations theory of Prof. Huntington, saying that more people die in civil wars than in the clash of civilizations. Dr. Jazz Shari Gianni, who was a student of Prof. Huntington at MIT in 1972, highlighted the gist of Huntingtons major publications and observed that Huntington was different from other scholars when he talked of pluralism in societies and cultures in comparison with his predecessors who only identified the rise and fall of one civilization against the other. He found Huntingtons approach subjective and linked with American interests.
 
Israeli’s War on Gaza
A Seminar on the Israeli War on Gaza: Causes and Consequences was organized by Iqbal International Institute for Research & Dialogue at International Islamic University Auditorium Islamabad. Dr. Anwar Hussain Siddiqui, President International Islamic University was in the chair while the panelists included Professor Pervez Hoodbhoy, Ambassador Tayyab Siddiqui, Professor Amna Mahmood Sandhu and Junaid Ahmad. A large number of intellectuals, diplomats, men of letters and students of International Relations and Politics participated in the session.

Professor Amna Mahmood Sandhu, a teacher in the Department of International Relations and Politics Department of International Islamic University focused on the role of United States in the Palestine-Israel conflict since the World War II. She observed that Israel had fought full fledged wars not only against the people of Palestine, whose land it had grabbed, but also against all its neighbours. Professor Sandhu said that a lot of hope has been placed with the induction of President Barak Obama.

Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy, a Professor of Physics at the Quaid-i-Azam University deplored the massacre in Palestine and stated that Gaza was reduced to a slum, and the recent bombing made it into an inferno. It is a strange contradiction that people of Palestine do not have a right to defend themselves, while Israel can use all kinds of air and land weapons to kill the Palestinians at will. He said it is also a contradiction that while US laws clearly identify that US weapons will not be used for aggression, Israel disregards all US laws with impunity and yet gets the largest amount of aide from United States. Ambassador Tayyab Siddiqui observed that it was indeed surprising that the UN resolutions only approved a cessation of hostilities and did not condemn the Israeli aggression. Mr. Junaid Ahmad observed that Israel had developed a strategy of grabbing Palestinian land through bombing and massacre at regular intervals and since President Obama is at a disadvantage in comparison with his predecessors, there is no way that he could offend the Israeli lobby in United States. Gaza, he observed, was at best an open air prison where Israel killed at will. Mr. Junaid Ahmad stated that through BDS (Boycott, Demonstrations, Sanctions), a nation could register its resentment in Western world more effectively, rather than through force or suicide attacks.

 
Iqbal Day
IRD in collaboration with Academy of Letters organized Iqbal day on 12 November, 2008. A large number of faculty members, students, distinguished guests and employees attended.
 
President Obama and the Muslim World
A lecture on America and the Muslim World under Obama: Continuity and Change was organized in both the campuses (Old Campus and New Campus) with David Barsamian, a renowned international broadcaster, writer, intellectual and author of What We Say Goes and Targeting Iran on 24th November, 2208. A large number of faculty members and students from International Islamic University were present and actively interacted with the distinguished guest.
 
U.K. Foreign Secretary David Miliband A Televised Debate at the IRD
The British Foreign Secretary David Miliband was the chief guest at a panel discussion on British Muslims organized by the IRD. Other panelists included the members of a delegation from Britain Mr. Aftab Malik, an editor and author, Mr. Navid Akhter, editor of a Muslim journal and a TV anchor and Mr. Muhammad Imran from a youth charity organization. The panel discussion was moderated by Ms. Jugnu Mohsin. A large number of students from International Islamic University were also present and actively interacted with the panel. Welcoming the panel, Dr Mumtaz Ahmad of the Iqbal International Institute of Research and Dialogue underscored the need of such panel discussions where Muslims from different background interact with local youth and learn from each others experience. The panel mostly focused on the questions of Muslim youth and their Islamic experience in Britain. The British Foreign Secretary also shared his experience of speaking in a Friday congregation at the main Damascus mosque in the previous week, where his interaction with local Muslims was welcomed for bringing interfaith harmony.

Mr. Miliband acknowledged that, like many other multicultural nations, Britain was not a perfect society in terms of the treatment of minorities, but was trying its best to remove all legal and institutional structures of discrimination.

 
Education Policy 2009
A National Conference on Draft Education Policy: 2009 was organized on 9 May, 2009 at the IIUI. The conference was organized in collaboration with IRD and IIUI. Renowned educationists and experts from all over the country participated. Prof. Fateh Muhammad Malik, Rector of the University was the chief guest. He stressed upon the need of merging Allama Iqbals thoughts on education and national ideology in the entire system of education. He called for launching a nationwide drive in this regard.

Dr. Anwar Hussain Siddiqui President, IIUI speaking on the occasion said that universal education is the key to progress of every nation. He said that at least 4% of GDP must be allocated for education.

Several groups undertook an in-depth and critical examination of the Draft New Education Policy: 2009 with particular reference to the purpose of education, access, quality, efficiency, medium of instruction, different system of education, curricula, instructional methodologies and materials, assessment of learning outcomes, teachers training and service conditions, educational management and financing of education.

Recommendations for reshaping the draft Education Policy: 2009 in accordance with ideology of Pakistan and thoughts of Iqbal were approved in the concluding session of the conference. These recommendations called for overhauling of the education system to meet modern day challenges.

 
The U.S. and the Muslim World: Deconstructing President Obamas Cairo Speech
A panel discussion was organized by IRD on The United States And The Muslim World: Deconstructing President Obamas Cairo Speech. Speakers included Senator Mushahid Hussain Sayed, Dr. Rukhsana Qamber, Director, Centre for American Studies, Quaid-e-Azam University, Mr. Tayyab Siddiqui, Former Pakistani Ambassador to Egypt, Dr. Mumtaz Ahmad, Executive Director, IRD, IIUI, Mr. Junaid Ahmad J.D., Visiting Fellow University of Cape Town, South Africa, and Professor Fateh Muhammad Malik, Rector, IIUI.

Senator Mushahid Hussain Sayed welcomed the change in the language and diction in President Obamas speech at Cairo University on 4 June, 2009 and observed that the ultimate test of President Obamas nice words about Muslims will be the actual shift in United States policy towards the Middle East and the Muslim world. Senator Mushahid Hussain Sayed said that President Obama is acutely aware of the new geostrategic realities and his Cairo speech is reflective of the changing policy of the United States in world affairs. He identified three significant aspects in President Obamas speech: First, President Obama rejected the view that Islam and Muslim are enemies of the United States or, for that matter, the United States considered Muslims as inherently hostile toward America. Second, President Obama seems to be moving away from Israel First policy to the America First policy in the Middle East. Finally, President Obama, for the first time, acknowledged genuine Iranian grievances and called for constructive dialogue and diplomatic negotiations to resolve US-Iran conflict.

Dr. Rukhsana Qamber, Director, Centre for American Studies, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad presented a detailed textual analysis of President Obamas Cairo speech and observed that both in terms of its discursive contents and specific policy statements, the Cairo speech was unlike any other that we have heard from any American Presidents in recent history. She noted that the President Obama did not use the word terror or terrorism at all in his speech and that itself is a great step forward in redefining the nature of international conflict.

Mr. Tayyab Siddiqui, Former Pakistani Ambassador to Egypt highlighted the differences in candidate Obamas election campaign rhetoric and his actual policies. He observed that litmus test of President Obamas promises in Cairo will be his administrations performance in the resolution of the Middle East conflict and in his ability to withstand the pressure of the pro-Israeli lobby in Washington.

Dr. Mumtaz Ahmad, Executive Director, IRD observed that the outcome of the recent visit of the Israeli Prime Minister to the White House clearly indicates that President Obamas agenda in the Middle East in not dictated by the proverbial Israeli lobby. President Obama is deeply aware of the centrality of the Palestine issue and is genuinely committed to a two-states solution of the Arab Israeli conflict.

Mr. Junaid Ahmad J.D., Visiting Fellow at the University of Cape Town, South Africa observed that the core of the issues that defines the strained relationships between the United States and the Muslim world is not some abstract notions of Islam but the actual policies of the United States that have caused tremendous suffering and devastation in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. It is true that President Obamas narrative is qualitatively different from that of President Bush but, at the same time, the essential moral biases in U.S policy towards Arab-Israel conflict can still be seen in President Obamas speech in which Israeli victimhood takes precedence over the Palestinian sufferings. Mr. Junaid observed that President Obama has an added advantage of succeeding the most despised American President in recent history.

Professor Fateh Muhammad Malik, Rector, IIUI stated that Muslim masses should stop looking towards Washington and London or even to their own rulers for the solution of their problems and rely instead on their own political power and spiritual strength as a moral community. Quoting extensively from the poet philosopher Allama Muhammad Iqbal, he observed that Muslim monarchs and dictators are the greatest obstacle in the realization of Iqbals ideal of creating a just social order and self-reliant Muslim Ummah.

 
International Conference Toward Revisiting the Debate on Shariah: Prospects and Challenges for Pakistan
2-day seminar under the auspices of the Iqbal International Institute for Research & Dialogue (IRD) of the International Islamic University, Islamabad (IIUI) & Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) ended here. Topic of the seminar was Toward Revisiting the Debate on Shariah: Prospects and Challenges for Pakistan.

Those who addressed on the concluding day of the seminar included Maulana Muhammad Khan Shirani, Maulana Mohsin Muzafar Naqvi, Syed Saeed Ahmed Shah Gujrati, Justice Syed Afzal Hadier, Dr. Moin Cheema, Dr. Zafar Ishaq Ansari, Naeem Jina, Khurshid Nadeem, Dr. Jameela Shoukat and others.Rector IIUI Professor Fateh Muhammad Malik, chaired the concluding session.

Dr. Khalid Masaud, Chairman Council of Islamic Ideology, Prof. Fateh Muhammad Malik, Rector, International Islamic University Islamabad (IIUI), Dr. Anwar Hussain Siddiqui, President IIUI, Dr. Muhammad Farooq, Vice Chancellor Sawat University, Dr. Moeen Chima, Australian National University, Dr. Mumtaz Ahmed, ED, IRD and others addressing opening session of the tow day conference on “Toward Revisiting the Debate on Shariah: Prospect and Challenges for Pakistan” held at IIUI.

A number of recommendations were adopted in the concluding session according to which it was stressed upon the need of a new look at Shariah Laws keeping in view the prevailing situation in the world. The participants asked the government to re-asses present curricula of Shariah faculties of the countries to enable the graduates to cope with latest requirements of the modern day. Earlier Dr. Muhammad Khalid Masood, Chairman of the CII delivered a keynote address on prospects of Shariah in Pakistan.

Dr. Khalid Masood in his keynote address said; Shariah stands for justice and peace but it is the cruelest irony of modern times that it conjures up fearful images of amputated hands, stoning and lashing in the western media. Regrettably, in the Muslim minds also Shariah invokes the notions of hudud, retribution and punishment. Debates on Shariah in Pakistan take the shape of demonstration against or in favor of its implementation and are associated with suicide bombings, militancy and bloodshed. It is perhaps the absence of serious rational analysis of the issues regarding Shariah in the public sphere that has turned these debates to be violent and blood-stained.

Dr. Khalid added that recent debates on Shariah are not limited to the Muslim countries; Shariah is debated in the whole globalized world including South Africa, United States of America, Britain and Canada. These debates have brought home the fact that we are living in an interdependent globalized world and whereas non-Muslim societies can no longer dismiss Shariah as irrelevant, Muslims cannot also effectively exercise Shariah as a modern legal system without taking the global context into consideration. Take the example of Canada. A Dutch scholar Anna Korteweg notes that from 2003 through 2006 a debate developed on the introduction of Shariah Law or Shariah arbitration in Ontario, Canada. The issue in its core was about legal principles and practices but it turned into a debate about womens inequality, and by extension to Canadian national identity and culture. The ensuing public lambasting of Islam reinforced the notion that Islam and gender inequality are inherently incompatible.

Important questions regarding faith-based arbitration were thus ignored, and with it the possibility to improve gender equality (The Shariah debate in Ontario, ISIM Review 18, 2006, 50). Similarly, invitation by the Archbishop of Canterbury to consider Shariah as a possible source of law for Muslim in Britain turned into a debate about national integration in Britain, Denmark, France and Australia. The fact that the academic and objective studies in these countries were not influenced by hysteric outbursts of fears and anxieties about Shariah becomes irrelevant in the Muslim world because religious establishments to rally against the Western criticism of Shariah. It helps them to avoid any mention of their weaknesses.

Dr. Khalid speaking on the present Tahrik Taliban said that it began as a movement for enforcement of Shariah in Swat and Waziristan but gradually became politicized. In general, all these movement failed to introduce social and legal reforms. Nevertheless, since these movements were projected as political movements against westernized regimes their leaders became here as of the age. Debates about Shariah have repeatedly ignored to analyze the failure of Shariah movements or to discuss the issues in the enforcement of Shariah in the present day globalized world. Dr. Khalid Masood stressed upon the need of Ijtihad through Parliament because the Muslim Parliaments represent Muslims aspirations and dreams.

 
Lecture of Ms. Dr. Qian Xauemei
The IRD, IIUI, organized a lecture of Ms. Dr. Qian Xauemei, Associate Professor of School of International Studies, Peking University in the Seminar Room, Central Library IIU New Campus on 14 October, 2009. The audience was the faculty members of the Departments of Politics & International Relations, History, Centre for Media & Communication Studies, Sociology, Psychology of Faculty of Social Sciences. We have also arranged a group discussion with the female Chinese students studying in IIUI.

The Rector, Prof. Fateh Muhammad Malik Sahib presided over the event whereas Ms. Parveen Kadir Agha was also present. Dr. Sial Sahib has greeted the guest and briefed about the objectives of IRD and its activities while moderator was Syed Muzammil Hussain. All heads of the departments briefed about their respective departments.

After concluding the seminar, Dr. Sial Sahib showed her female campus where she had interacted with the professors and female students. She was also shown the trees planted by H.E. Ambassador of China and head of cultural wing in the premises of the University. Then the delegation was taken in the Faisal Mosque along with Ms. Samina Mehtab, Director of Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The delegation was briefed about the Faisal Mosque. CDA personnel were also present

 
Lecture of Ms. Dr. Chris Seiple
The IRD, IIUI, organized two lectures of Dr. Chris Seiple, President of the Institute for Global Engagement, USA at the International Islamic University, Islamabad (IIUI) on the following topics:-

i) Trends among American Evangelical Christians and their Approaches to Islam” on Monday, January 11, 2010 at 11:30 A.M at IRI Auditorium, International Islamic University Faisal Masjid Campus Islamabad

ii) The Concept of Justice as a Framework for Bridging Muslim-Christian Misunderstanding” on Tuesday, January 12, 2010 at 11:00 A.M at Seminar Room, Main Library, New Campus, H-10 Sector, Islamabad

Dr. Chris Seiple said; Justice is an attribute of Allah Al-Mighty and there shall be no peace without justice on this planet. This was main theme of Dr. Chriss lecture who advocated a peaceful co-existence between followers of all religions especially Abrahamic religions. He spoke on various similarities among Muslims and Christians. For example, he quoted Oneness of God which is hallmark of faith of Muslims and Christians. Dr. Chris added that although there are a lot of differences among Muslims and Christians, but they can live together for better future of the human beings. Here are some points from Dr. Chris Seiples speech:

 
Islam Religion to Live
IRD, IIU has organized a lecture of Grand Mufti of Bosnia, Prof Dr. Mustafa Cheric on Islam Religion to Live at the International Islamic University, Islamabad (IIUI) on 20th February, 2010 in collaboration with Iqbal Academy, Lahore. Mr. Hamid Saeed Kazmi, Federal Minister for Religious Affairs was Chief Guest while Professor Fateh Muhammad Malik, Rector IIUI also spoke on the occasion.

In his speech Dr. Mustafa said: Islam is a faith, Knowledge and morality. He added that Islam gave a unique faith to human beings supported by knowledge and moral values. He however said that present day Muslims are lagging far behind of the world due to their ignorance of their faith, knowledge and morality. He gave some facts to strengthen his view point.

It is in the debate about the kind of secularization of the Muslim history and the method of (re)isalmization of the Muslim mind that we may recognize the problem of the modern Muslim identity. The idea of secularization did not come to Muslims as a result of their own experience. It has always been felt by the majority of Muslim Ulama (scholars) and some Muslim intellectuals as well that the idea of secularization of the Muslim societies has come from the west by a sort of political and sometimes even by military pressure. This is one of the reasons why the secularization of the Muslim history, except perhaps in Turkey and Tunisia, has failed and this is why the drive for a kind of reislamiation of the Muslim mind is taking place. This have refused to give up the idea of a universal community of Islam (The Ummah) even if it means, at least for the time being, a utopia. To the Muslims, who believe in the concept of the islamization, secularism is nothing more than an ethnic, racial and national conception of cultural identity.

Nevertheless, the Muslims did accept the concept of nation state identity for whatever reasons and thus are aware of the concept of a multiple identities. It is in the idea of multiple identities that one can find a satisfaction for a universal identity such as an Islamic identity in a presumable Non-Islamic state. And it is here that I see the reason for our question: is there an identity of European Muslims? Hamid Saeed Kazmi and Professor Fateh M. Mailk in their speeches appreciated role of the Bosnian Muslims in the world. They said that Bosnians by their sacrifices revived Muslim glory in the world arena. The Grand Mufti presented copies of the Holy Quran printed in Bosnia to Hamid Saeed Kami & Fateh Muhammad Malik whereas Professor Malik presented IIUI crest to the Grand Mufti

 
ISLAMIC ECONOMICS IS SYMBOLIZED IN JUSTICE
Dr. Chapra, Prof. Khursheed Ahmad and Anwar Siddiqui also Spoke The International Islamic University, Islamabad (IIUI) in connection with its Silver Jubilee Celebrations, organized a distinguished lecture of Dr. Umer Chapra, Research Advisor, Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), Islamic Development Bank (IDB), Jeddah On “State of Islamic Economics 2010”. Senator Prof. Khursheed Ahmad, Chairman, Institute of Policy Studies, Islamabad was the chief guest on the occasion while Dr. Anwar Hussain Siddiqui President IIUI introduced the guest speaker to the audience who were faculty members, leading economists of twin cities and students of the Islamic University and others educational institutions of the federal capital. Dr. Zafar Ishaq Ansari Vice-President of the university was also present on the occasion.

Dr. Umer Chapra said that Islamic Economist is different from conventional economics because Islamic Economics derives its power from teachings of the Holy Quran of Adl which means justice for all. Islamic Economic System is based on the principle of equal, wise and justified distribution of wealth in the society. It also stresses upon fulfillment of material needs of all citizens of a state/territory without any discrimination because Islam speaks of Rehmat-ul-Lil-Alameen which is for all and not for Muslims only. He admitted that the world is run by conventional economic system based on market economy which in-fact grabs all resources of the human beings. He said that Islamic Economics is although difficult but not impossible. He gave many examples of Islamic Banking in the world.

Prof. Khursheed Ahmad in his presidential address said that Islamic Economics is response to the thirst of people to live in a peace of mind which comes from spiritual peace so Islamic Economics is not only response to the worldly needs of the peoples but also their spiritual needs. He added that Islamic Banking is progressing rapidly in the world and predicted that soon the Islamic Economic System shall replace present system of subjugation and suppression. Dr. Anwar Hussain Siddiqui while introducing the guest speaker said that he was pioneer of the Islamic Economics not only in Pakistan but in the Muslim world and non-muslin world alike. About the IIUI, Dr. Siddiqui said that it is also marching in the same direction and so far prepared thousands of experts of the Islamic Economics System. Dr. Muhammad Umer Chapra, Research Advisor, Islamic Research and Training Institute Islamic Development Bank, Jeddah, flanked by Senator Professor Khursheed Ahmed, Chairman, Institute of Policy Studies, Islamabad, Dr. Zafar Ishaq Ansari Vice President, International Islamic University, Islamabad (IIUI) and Dr. Anwar Hussain Siddiqui, President IIUI at the stage of lecture “The State of Islamic Economics 2010” held at IIUI

Dr. Muhammad Umer Chapra, Research Advisor, Islamic Research and Training Institute Islamic Development Bank, Jeddah, Senator Professor Khursheed Ahmed, Chairman, Institute of Policy Studies, Islamabad, and Dr. Anwar Hussain Siddiqui, President (IIUI) speaking at the lecture “The State of Islamic Economics 2010” at IIUI

 
International Conference on “Islam & Governance”
First Day:

2-day International Conference on “Islam & Governance” started at the International Islamic University, Islamabad (IIUI) in connection with its Silver Jubilee under the auspices of its offshoot Iqbal International Institute of Research & Dialogue (IRD) and in collaboration with International Islamic University, Malaysia (IIUM). Professor Fateh Muhammad Malik, Rector IIUI was the chief guest on the occasion.

Professor Malik said that the movement for the creation of Pakistan sprang from the ideal, popularly known as the Allama Iqbals concept of Pakistan. After the assassination of the first Prime Minister of Pakistan, Mr. Liaquat Ali Khan, civil and military bureaucracy took the reins of power into their hands and betrayed the ideal of Pakistan by taking the path of subservience to the interests of the United State of America (USA).

The Rector IIUI added that the Salvation of Pakistani society depends on translation of the ideal of Pakistan into a reality but the colonial mindset of the ruling elites is the greatest hindrance in the fulfillment of the ideal, conceived and articulated by Allama Iqbal and unfolded by Jinnah. He stressed upon the need of enhancing standards of governance in accordance with teachings of Islam. According to Prof. Malik only distinction of Islamic mode of governance is justice for all and rule of Law. Other speakers of the first day of the conference included Dr. Mumtaz Ahmed, Professor of Political Science at Hampton University, VA, USA & Executive Director of IRD of IIUI, Dr. Abdullah Ahsan Professor of History, International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC) of IIUM, Professor Stephen B Young Global Executive Director of the Caux Round Table (CRT), Mr. Abdullah, Chairman NWFP, Public Service Commission Peshawar, Prof. Alparsalan Acigenc, Deputy Rector Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey, Dr. Recep Senturk, Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey and Tayyab Siddiqui Former Ambassador of Pakistan.

Prof. Stephen B Young said that the Lockes thesis on the proper legitimacy of government was adopted by Great Britian and was summarized in the Declaration of Independence of the North American colonies. His conclusion was that government consists of power held in trust for the benefit of the people begin with certain assumptions about the natural conditions into which all people are born. Locke starts not with religious teachings or a moral code of right and wrong but with observations about the natural order. Lockes solution to the problem of conflict inherent in the human condition is to establish government. On the other hand, Quranic revelation provides us with analogous concepts to those used by Locke. It presents six inter-related aspects of that destiny, which are the nature of humanity, the assumption of trust responsibility, the office of khalifah, the necessity of wise discernment, the use of good counsel, and the seeking of justice.

In searching for a just form of government consistent with Quanic guidance, it would not be inappropriate to adopt John Lockes understanding that public office is a public trust, where people expect good governance and justice from the government. Prof. Alparsalan Acigenc of Deputy Rector Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey spoke on the Late Ottoman Thought (1700-1950) on Good Governance and its Impact on Modern Turkey. He said that the 18th and 19th Centuries represent the climax of the chaotic socio-political history of the Ottomans. We have seen the aftermath of the Tulip period, which began to give its fruits in the sphere of thought as the rise of westernization and modernization. On the other side, we find those who resist this radical change either in the form of nationalism or Islamism. The nineteenth century is, therefore, the battle arena of these opposing trends. Among many scholars and activists during this period intellectuals such as Namik Kemal and Mehmed Akif are considered from among the Islamic movement. Another personality of this period is Bediuzzaman Said Nursi (1873-1960). Their ideas made a significant comeback at the end of the 20th century. This paper will be a brief discussion of these scholars in order to show how their though could contribute the idea of good governance in relation to the corporate approach in recent decades.

Professor Recep of Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey said that the history of the Ottoman political thought can be divided into two major periods: First, the classical period which was characterized by purely Islamic political thought, and the second, which begins with the declaration of the Tanzimat reforms in 1839, the period of modernization and reforms which was characterized by combining Islamic and Western political thought and institutions. This paper drew a very broad picture of the highly neglected first period of the Ottoman political thought from the 13th to the early 19th centuries. In that period, Ottoman scholars produced political works from the perspective of their academic and social positions. Each genre attempted to answer the question of establishing a just rule according to the Islamic principles from its own perspective.

Former Ambassador Tayyab Siddiqui said that OIC is an organization of Muslim countries; and acts as representative of the Muslim Ummah. His examined the previous performance and challenges faced by the Muslim world in the form of: absence of genuine leadership, rising campaign against Islam and inability to implement its charter. OIC can achieve its status as per charter if addressed: challenge of democracy, challenge of defense of Islam and challenge of the development of the Muslim societies

Second Day

Second day of the conference started on 12th March 2010 at the Faisal Masjid campus of the university. Mr. Ali Qazilbash, Chairman of law school LUMS, Lahore presided over the session.

The speakers of the second day of the conference included Dr. Zahid H Bukhari, Director, American Muslim Studies Program (AMSP) at the Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, Professor Tahir Amin, Professor Department of IR, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Dr. Prof. Sohail Mahmood, Head Department of International Relations, National University of Modern Language (NUML), Islamabad, Professor Dr. Muhammad Arif Zakaullah, Professor Management Center of IIUM.

Dr. Zahid said that the international institutions measure the progress of the human societies, and then rank them accordingly, in their annual reports. The world Bank, the United Nations, the freedom House, and the U.S. Department of States are some of those institutions which rank the countries of the world on a range of issues: per capita income, gross domestic product, human development, human rights, and religious and democratic freedom, etc. The purpose of the annual reports and indexes of the progress of nation states is to create a giant mirror where each country may see its own development, or lack of it, and also place itself in a global matrix. The main purpose of the human collective activities, largely guided by various types of governance models, is to create an environment of justice. The paramount purpose for which the prophets were sent to struggle all their lives was to guide man to achieve justice. Having a balanced society it largely depend on the quality and ability of good governance. The main challenge, however is how to conceptualize, develop, measure an index of a just and balanced society?

Professor Tahir Amin said that the rise of Islamic militancy in the tribal areas of Pakistan has emerged as the most serious problem in the post 9/11 era. The drone attacks, terrorist incidents, suicide bombing and the penetration of external powers in Pakistan have created such an uncertainty that most Pakistanis have seriously become concerned about the continuing survival of Pakistan. The major objective of this paper is to analyze the domestic and international factors contribution to the rise of Islamic militancy in the tribal areas of Pakistan. The argument of this paper is that it is the policy of the Pakistani state which has mainly been responsible for contributing to the rise of militancy in Pakistan. Emergence of Taliban both in Afghanistan as well as in Pakistan has been the consequence of that policy. American policy towards Afghanistan and the border areas of Pakistan and Indian involvement on the western borders of Pakistan have also played its part in aggravating Pakistans troubles.

Dr. Professor Sohail Mahmood said that the paper discusses the theory of Islamic Good Governance with emphasis on important Islamic concepts of rule of law, shura, ijtihad and ijma. The notion of rule of law is integral to the concept of the Islamic state and the shariah. Proof of Shura is to be found in the Quran and Sunnah. The concept of Ijitihad is accepted widely and it is argued that the work of Ijitihad be institutionalized for attaining good governance. Ijitihad is the essential principle of change in Islam which included social and political change. The Ijitihad of Muhammad Iqbal is an example of such creativity. The sole prerogative of the ulama to ascertain Ijitihad is challenged in the paper. Lastly, the concept of ijma may be institutionalized into a modern parliament and other bodies where the Muslim professionals and academics are well represented. The likelihood of such breakthroughs are examined in the concrete situation of the Muslim world.

Professor Dr. M Arif Zakaullah said that the Economic policy making is an exercise in decision making to ensure that the economy enjoys growth with stability, full employment, stable price level and trade expansion with balance of payments equilibrium. When seen from this perspective one focuses on the role of policy making institutions, policy challenges and targets and the effective implementation of policies. All of this fits very well with the idea of economic policies are directly linked with the framework of good governance, philosophy, framework and fundamentals of governance. The prominent contemporary historian Paul Kennedy also identifies a strong link between economic management and governance. The link between Economy and Governance can be seen in the economies of USSR and USA during the cold war and in global crisis of 2008.

Pakistan has a different root cause. Its economy is a mixed economy dominated by elite families. The feudal elite have successfully co-opted military, media and the civil bureaucracy. This attitude towards the economic governance led to the breakup of the country in 1971 as East Pakistan became Bangladesh. On the other hand, Malaysian leadership does not come from a particular narrow elite group, the Malaysian leaders do not address the issues and problems from the narrow perspective of a particular and small elite group rather they learnt from their mistakes and try to improve and genuinely solve the problem from the nations stability and growth point of view.

 
Seminar to commemorate the anniversary of the National hero of Vietnam Mr. Hochi Minh
 
Lecture by Dr. Gulfishan Khan, Associate Professor of History at Aligarh University, India
i) Mughal Court Cultures Perceptions of the West” held on 3 May, 2010 at IRI Auditorium.

ii) “Ulama and Delhi Madrasah: A Forgotten Page in Indian Muslim Education” on 4 May, 2010 at IRI Auditorium
 

 
Youth Trip to IRD
39 male and female students who have got first positions in Secondary and Higher Secondary Boards of Sindh in the year 2009 are visiting IRD on 24-06-2010 at 11:00 A.M. Executive Director, IRD would brief them on education and development on global level. They would also be briefed on the objectives of IRD. Their trip has been arranged by the Youth Department, Government of Sind.